Repository navigation
Conversation
A <DUP> took its length only from INFO/SVLEN, so one described by INFO/END alone was returned unchanged rather than realigned.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 Written by Claude
Fixes #2601.
realign()read a<DUP>'s length only fromINFO/SVLEN, so a<DUP>withINFO/ENDbut noSVLENcame back asERR_SYMBOLICand was not left-aligned (a<DEL>with onlyENDalready was). This falls back toEND - POSwhenSVLENis absent; the existingINFO/ENDupdate then writes the realigned end.Test
norm.symbolic.4(reusing thenorm.symbolic.3reference) has the explicit dup, theEND-only<DUP>and theSVLEN+END<DUP>; all three now normalize to position 11 withEND=18.test/test.plpasses (1994/1994).