I'm looking through the instructions on docs.rockylinux.org and the provided copr is neil/incus. This repo does not contain incus for rocky 10 and is at least a year out of date for rocky 9.
I do a little more digging and discover that the linuxcontainers.org/incus documentation instructs you to install the neelc/incus copr.
The neelc/incus repository is labeled on copr.coprfedorainfracloud.org as being a fork of the original neil/incus.
The "official" documentation here assures me that Neil Hanlon is an official rocky infra co-lead, but then it actually requires a bait and switch to a different repository maintained by an account with an almost homopone name with no such provenance. It is claiming on the copr page that it's a fork of Neil's repo because the previous isn't compatible (?! A Rocky infra lead isn't maintaining it for rocky?)
While I don't think anything malicious is going on, I feel it's worth pointing out how incredibly suspect it looks from the outside.
I am not going to dig further into the why, but the docs need to have the incus section removed or assurances of it's support/compatibility need to be removed. Using Neil's credibility here is a bad idea for official documentation for something obviously not well maintained.
I'm looking through the instructions on docs.rockylinux.org and the provided copr is
neil/incus. This repo does not contain incus for rocky 10 and is at least a year out of date for rocky 9.I do a little more digging and discover that the linuxcontainers.org/incus documentation instructs you to install the
neelc/incuscopr.The
neelc/incusrepository is labeled on copr.coprfedorainfracloud.org as being a fork of the originalneil/incus.The "official" documentation here assures me that Neil Hanlon is an official rocky infra co-lead, but then it actually requires a bait and switch to a different repository maintained by an account with an almost homopone name with no such provenance. It is claiming on the copr page that it's a fork of Neil's repo because the previous isn't compatible (?! A Rocky infra lead isn't maintaining it for rocky?)
While I don't think anything malicious is going on, I feel it's worth pointing out how incredibly suspect it looks from the outside.
I am not going to dig further into the why, but the docs need to have the incus section removed or assurances of it's support/compatibility need to be removed. Using Neil's credibility here is a bad idea for official documentation for something obviously not well maintained.