Repository navigation
Allow flexible parametrization of cost estimator functions (#768) - #1460
dhanvanthbalaji wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
…tory_count and routing_overhead_proportion (Closes quantumlib#768)
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
|
The following problems will need to be fixed before we go further with this.
For items 1 & 2, please read up on git commit message practices. |
|
The code changes in this PR do not address the issue, and the revised PR description shows strong signs of being the copy-pasted output of an LLM. Closing this PR because the repository maintainers do not have time to iterate on low-quality LLm output. |
Description
This PR updates
cost_estimatorinopenfermion.resource_estimatesto allow user-defined values for key physical costing variables, addressing maintainer specifications in #768.Changes Included
cost_estimator:factory_count(default:4)routing_overhead_proportion(default:0.5)surface_code_cycle_time(default:datetime.timedelta(microseconds=1))data_qubit_distances(default:range(7, 35, 2))AlgorithmParametersinstantiation and logic to pass these parameters dynamically.Closes #768