[patmmccann]

Summary

Resolve all 43 entries in the Docs say Prebid Server (pbs: true), but neither PBS Go nor PBS Java has the bidder category of the product-sync report.

• 37 absent in both PBS Go and Java: set pbs: false, leaving PBJS support unchanged. Where pbs_app_supported: true was present, set it to false as well, to avoid contradictory app support claims.
• Six case-only mismatches: preserve pbs: true and align PBS-specific names. PBS-only AdView → adview, progX → progx in biddercode; dual-platform SMB, defineMedia, interactiveOffers, nextMillennium retain their PBJS biddercode and gain an explicit pbs_biddercode with the lowercase canonical PBS name.

This avoids silently breaking client-side bidder codes or download-module names. Note: the new pbs_biddercode metadata is interpreted by the sync report in PR #6910, whose checker has been updated to honor it. Merge #6910 before/alongside this PR to clear the four dual-platform case warnings.

No adapters are deleted and no enable_download settings are changed. All changes are front matter except a short clarifying note for SMB and AdView.

Verification

Checked the changed docs against the original 43-item report, with case-only support kept distinct from unsupported code. CI pending.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for prebid-docs-preview ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	bcf1963
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/prebid-docs-preview/deploys/6ae63c92da6794ca2a19b47c
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-6914--prebid-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-31T09:30:03.555495Z	b6a30c8	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-31T09:24:22.524890Z	b6a30c8	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b6a30c8359

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[ChrisHuie]

@patmmccann we would have to look at each of these in more detail. Looked at 3 and they were all unique. PBS or PBjs true also doesn't mean they are currently in master if that is the assumption? It's kind of like docs. We don't delete docs except on rare occasions because other versions/publishers could still be active. It means they were once in Prebid essentially... Don't care much about changing that assumption but that is how it is throughout the docs.

prebid/prebid-server-java#3096 - analytics adapter in server
prebid/prebid-server#4738 - approved and going in soon so would just have to flip right back

[patmmccann]

#5612 asks for these pages to sync to reality; it is trivial to flip them back and forth once #6910 is merged to keep in sync with reality.

Analytics adapters are not bidders

[ChrisHuie]

@patmmccann nope but its less work then just dealing with it for a week or two. People tie their docs to PBjs and Prebid Server and JS merges much faster so assume there are a few where they set their docs to both and JS got merged and we missed the Server flag. We try to have them break them out or hold the merge up. Also, don't think there is another place where Analytics Adapters for server are listed actually? Could be wrong. So a larger question on breaking them out I would assume.

[ChrisHuie]

thinking about it don't think PBS true controls the displaying under the bidder search? So maybe it doesn't matter.

**claude says it does control that. However, should it show up there probably not. Not sure how many other Analytics Adapters do that since there isn't an Analytics Adapters section like in JS. We could create one and just move the ones that use this flag that way?