Skip to content

Cross-compiled libs present a naming mismatch? #107

Description

@The-Cyber-Captain

Godot version

v4.5.1.stable.official [f62fdbde1]

godot-cpp version

godot-4.5-stable [e83fd09]

System information

Windows 11

Issue description

Could easily be use-error; delving into here-be-dragons territory here to make myself a GDExtension as a workaround to a (perceived) limitation in Core. But following on from @dsnopek 's GodotCon2024 workshop, and another GDE I built last year as a test, I do appear to have an appropriately functional build pipeline. Albeit a cross-compiling one; Android extension built on a Win11 device.

I'm assuming - what with Godot being Godot, reliance on CI, etc - this is indeed a supported workflow!?

TL;DR - What I'm seeing is the final library coming out of scons being named demo\bin\android\godot_photogrammetry.android.template_debug.arm64.so.
Whereas both convention and Godot (via \demo\bin\photogrammetry.gdextension) expect to see demo/bin/android/libgodot_photogrammetry.android.template_debug.x86_64.so instead.

I rename the wee bandit and she works fine. It's a nuisance, obviously, however. And could put others off from leveraging the awesomeness of GDE I suspect. Just wondering if this is expected behaviour of the template, a supported / unsupported workflow, bug... or some silly setting on my side I've simply not configured properly. 🤦

Clearly the behaviour itself comes from godot-cpp/tools/windows.py setting env["SHLIBPREFIX"] = "", and scons running with that, post resolution of Issue #55

Thoughts? TIA.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions