chore: bump pyodide-build to 0.25.1

[dimastbk]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated how Pyodide settings are read during CI configuration; the resulting workflow outputs remain unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 019d325a-79c5-4acc-8976-50da08a54926

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6edec2 and 3bc37a8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/CI.yml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Pyodide configuration step now stores each setting in a shell variable before writing the four existing values to $GITHUB_OUTPUT.

Changes

Pyodide CI outputs

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Capture and write configuration outputs .github/workflows/CI.yml	The step captures four Pyodide configuration values in shell variables, then writes the existing named outputs. Output names and values are unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 3bc37

The four Pyodide outputs retain their existing names and values, so this change introduces no material CI risk.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title names a Pyodide build version bump. The summarized change updates how the Pyodide configuration step writes outputs, so the title relates to the change but does not clearly describe it.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{A rabbit checks the settings with care,
Four values hop from shell to output there.
Their names stay just the same,
Their values keep their place,
CI writes them in a tidy chain.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}