Conversation
| Create a project using LangGraph (the default framework). Use `--framework openai` instead to | ||
| create an **OpenAI Agents SDK** project. This chooses the agent framework, not the model provider; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Create a project using LangGraph (the default framework). Use `--framework openai` instead to | |
| create an **OpenAI Agents SDK** project. This chooses the agent framework, not the model provider; | |
| Create your new agent project (with default framework of LangGraph). Use `--framework openai` instead to | |
| create an **OpenAI Agents SDK** project. This chooses the agent framework, not the model provider; |
| ```sh | ||
| SESSION_ID=$(python3 -c 'import uuid; print(uuid.uuid4())') | ||
| INVOCATION_ID=$(python3 -c 'import uuid; print(uuid.uuid4())') | ||
| agentbricks endpoint invoke --url http://localhost:8000 \ | ||
| --path /api/invocations \ | ||
| --json "{\"id\":\"$INVOCATION_ID\",\"session_id\":\"$SESSION_ID\",\"input\":{\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"Use count_words to count the words in: the quick brown fox\"}]}}" | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It feels weird that we're introducing the invoke command for the first time only down here in the tool section. Should it be moved up after you do dev or deploy?
| output for access or tracing warnings. `deployments get` prints the App URL and status; open the URL | ||
| and send a message to verify the deployed agent. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Add a custom tool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why should the custom tool here be in the quick start instead of later on?
| memory = memory.update(content="The user prefers very concise answers.") | ||
| memory.delete() | ||
| ``` | ||
| ## Project ownership and upgrades |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this more about a dev guide and less of a user guide?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in general I still and we need to be very hard to follow. I see this as a combination of helping the user to get started and teaching them how to do things, but then there's also a combination of how developers could iterate on this. I feel like the split is not exactly clear. Is there a better way that we can structure?
jamesbxwu
changed the title
This branch has not been deployed
1 participant
Summary
Verification
git diff --checkand the repository commit hook passed.Tracking: ML-70356