Skip to content

test: validate VULN-566 trust follow-ups - #264

Merged
howonlee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/566-2
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

howonlee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/566-2

Conversation

@howonlee

@howonlee howonlee commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Validate VULN-566 trust and cache follow-ups.

@linear

linear Bot commented Nov 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

VULN-566

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Walkthrough

This pull request updates repository approval documentation and adds Bats integration tests for retained Git directories and legacy startup caches. The tests cover CLI, Bash, Zsh, and Fish behavior. The follow-up documentation records validation, version history, and scope boundaries.

Changes

Repository Trust Follow-ups

Layer / File(s) Summary
Retained Git directory trust
docs/configuration.md, docs/security-vuln-566-followup.md, tests/trust_followup.bats
The documentation distinguishes replacing a common Git directory from replacing its contents. Integration tests check hook execution when the directory is retained and check that changing hook configuration produces no result.
Legacy startup-cache validation
docs/security-vuln-566-followup.md, tests/trust_followup.bats
The documentation records old-cache behavior, version history, migration steps, and validation boundaries. Tests check whether a legacy startup marker appears before cache regeneration and is absent afterward.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: natoboram

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to d1fa0

The approval guidance and regression tests clarify existing trust and cache behavior; no merge-blocking issue is established.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5

Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed The title clearly describes the pull request’s main change: tests that validate VULN-566 trust follow-ups.
Docstring Coverage Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 2 functions across 1 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches

Generate docstrings

  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
Generate unit tests (beta)

  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

A rabbit checks the hooks at play
While Git keeps identity its way
The shells all test the cache anew
Old startup markers vanish too
The bunny hops through tests in view

Recent review info

Run configuration

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc8afc0 and d1fa00e.

Files selected for processing: 3

  • docs/configuration.md
  • docs/security-vuln-566-followup.md
  • tests/trust_followup.bats

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 100 included reviews per hour; 98 remain after this review.

@howonlee
howonlee merged commit 92a4dde into main Nov 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@howonlee
howonlee deleted the bugfix/566-2 branch November 10, 2026 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant