Repository navigation
Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #4290
Rationale for this change
idempotency-key-lifetime, after which clients send anIdempotency-Key(UUIDv7) on mutations and reuse it on retry, so a retried commit can't apply twice. PyIceberg sent no key and never retriedPOST.rest.client.*retry policy also coversPOST, reusing the key across retries, as Java'sRESTSessionCatalogdoes.Are these changes tested?
test_rest.py— mutations carry a UUIDv7 key only when advertised, a different one per operation, and reads carry none; aPOSTretried after a 503 reuses its key.Are there any user-facing changes?
idempotency-key-lifetime, mutations sendIdempotency-KeyandPOSTis retried underrest.client.*.