Mapping portable authority continuity onto the intervention points

[Terrynce White (terryncew)]

I'm Terrynce, building OpenLine — an open-source receiver-owned authorization layer. The core property: the receiver independently verifies current authority for the exact action before accepting the effect, and authority (mandates, revocations, receipts) is portable across models and providers. Demonstrated in a frozen, re-runnable experiment where a Claude → Codex switch preserved the owner mandate after the first provider was revoked: https://github.com/terryncew/openline-wallet/blob/main/APPROVED_JOB_LIVE_001.md

ACS's intervention points look like the natural policy surface for this. The piece I don't see covered is continuity across providers — what happens to standing authority when the model or runtime underneath changes. Is cross-provider authority continuity in scope for the spec, or better left to implementations? Happy to write up a mapping of the wallet/gate concepts onto your intervention points if that's useful.

— Terrynce