[stuartc]

Description

This branch does two things. It adds idempotent PUT and GET endpoints for projects, credentials and collections, open to a person's token or the service account. It then moves every JSON API error onto one shape: an RFC 9457 problem document with a fixed code a client can switch on, produced by one fixed order of checks, so one condition always gets one status. It is the Lightning side of jig's apply for CON-329 (projects), CON-331 (credentials) and CON-334 (collections). The API contract is ADR 0024 in the jig repo. It replaces #5238, which this stacked on.

The branch is 20 commits on main at b034e0290e, grouped by how the code fits together rather than by history. Each commit compiles and passes its own tests, so you can review commit by commit.

New endpoints

• PUT /api/projects/:id creates a project under a client-chosen id or replaces its name, description and members. GET is open to the service account too.
• PUT and GET /api/credentials/:id. A service account names the owner by email, and a person can only name themselves. Project links are only ever added.
• PUT and GET /api/projects/:project_id/collections/:id.
• Service-account scopes projects:write, credentials:write and collections:write. Sending the same body twice changes nothing and writes no audit event.

How authorisation works (see SERVICE_ACCOUNTS.md)

• Authentication only proves who is calling. Lightning.Scope describes the caller: actor, grants, instance role, MFA status and, once a project is involved, facts about it such as being scheduled for deletion.
• Policies decide from the scope in one order: grant, then standing, then project state. A missing grant is 403 insufficient_scope, checked before any lookup, so it is 403 even for an id that doesn't exist. A caller with the grant but no standing gets 404, so a caller who can't see something learns nothing about it. Only a caller who would otherwise be allowed hears 409 scheduled_for_deletion.
• Controllers ask the policy by action name through the AuthorizeAction plug, before any body parse or lookup.
• Writes record an actor (Lightning.Actor: a user or the service account) in the audit trail.

What a client sees

Every error from /api/*, /collections/*, /adaptors/catalogue, /i/* and the channel proxy's own answers is a problem document: type is always about:blank, with status, title, code, a fixed detail, and an errors list only when the cause has a place in the request. Each errors entry has one location member (pointer, parameter, header or path). The content type is application/problem+json when the client asks for it with Accept, and the same body as application/json otherwise. The OAuth token endpoint, /metrics and LiveView are out of scope.

Breaking changes for existing callers:

1. Every error body changes shape, and the detail text is no longer translated ("This field can't be blank." becomes "can't be blank"). The "errors": {} member is gone from success bodies.
2. No standing on a resource is 404, not 401, 403 or 422. A path id that isn't a UUID is 404.
3. The scope is checked before any lookup, so a missing grant is 403 even for an id that doesn't exist.
4. 401 means a failed login only, and every 401 carries WWW-Authenticate. An unmet MFA requirement is 403. A malformed Bearer header is 400 invalid_request (was 401). Basic on a bearer route counts as no token.
5. A service-account token request with no scope is refused with 400 invalid_scope instead of getting every scope.
6. /api/users needs an operator token, reads fields from the body only, and refuses unknown keys with 422 unknown_key. A taken email is 409 taken with existing.id.
7. Plan limits are 402 (were 400, 403 or 422), and 429 on /i/*. A catalogue that isn't loaded is 503 not_ready with Retry-After: 5, not a 90 second wait.
8. A credential deleted while in use is 409 in_use (was 500). Two jobs with one name are 409 taken (was 422). A non-object JSON body is 400 malformed.
9. PUT /collections with a bad value is 422 (was 200 with "error": "Format error"), so jobs that silently lost writes now fail.
10. Errors that happen before the router (bad request, timeout, too-long URL or body, wrong content type) on /api and /collections are problem documents instead of HTML.
11. Updating or re-scheduling a credential that is scheduled for deletion is refused for everyone. Repo-connection tokens get 403 insufficient_scope with a WWW-Authenticate header on the new APIs and their own project's older read routes (was 401). A non-owner reading a credential gets 404, not 403.
12. List self links carry only the query parameters the server applied.
13. GET /api/projects/:project_id/workflows/new and .../workflows/:id/edit no longer route. Both answered 500 before.

Commits after #5239's own

The groups, in order: A1-A2 (shared format, renderer, a Credo check that every changeset error has a code), B1 (#5239's four controllers on the format), C1-C4 (scope before lookup, errors before the router, provisioning), D1-D7 (workflows, jobs, runs, work orders, log lines, AI assistant, /collections, webhooks and channel proxy, the review round on D), E1-E6 (raised errors, the 401 edge, /api/users, lookups and pagination moved into contexts, a lost save race answers 409 concurrent_edit, test-file splits), F1-F5 (what core and web each own, error modules merged 15 to 12, status-only codes named as HTTP names them, no Basic challenge on triggers and channels, one concurrent_edit path), T (test reorganisation and the rules file for the API tests) and Z (CHANGELOG.md and SERVICE_ACCOUNTS.md). git log --oneline on the branch lists them with their letters.

Validation steps

1. mix test test/lightning_web/controllers/api test/lightning/policies test/lightning/scope_test.exs
2. With SERVICE_ACCOUNT_PUBLIC_KEY set, get a token with scope=projects:write credentials:write collections:write, then PUT a project, a credential and a collection twice with the same body. Expect 201 then 200, and no second audit event.
3. jig's scripts/e2e.sh against this branch runs the lot end to end. Set LIGHTNING_REPO to this branch until jig's default is re-pinned to its tip.

What the final check on the rebased tip found: mix compile --warnings-as-errors, mix format --check-formatted, mix credo --strict --all, mix dialyzer (4 errors, all skipped by the ignore file) and mix sobelow all pass. The full suite is 7194 tests with three failures under load, all passing alone on the same seed. One ProjectsTest export test (channels are included in the export) failed once under load and passed on four reruns and alone. It sorts channels by a timestamp stored to the second, and it predates this branch. Over HTTP against a dev server, a plan-limit refusal gave 402 exceeds_limit on the workflows API and 429 exceeds_limit on a webhook, with the fixed detail and none of the limiter's own text.

Additional notes for the reviewer

Needs a deliberate yes:

1. With credentials:write a service account can create a credential owned by any user and link it to any project (ADR 0022). The 409 id_taken on an owner mismatch is what stops it rewriting someone else's credential.
2. A person naming any owner but themselves gets 403, even for an unknown email, so the endpoint can't be used to find accounts.
3. API DELETE of a scheduled credential still deletes it at once, as today.

Follow-ups are in Linear: CON-357 (remaining policies onto Scope), CON-358 (kit's 409 message), CON-359 (contexts take a Scope, plus a Credo check).

The CHANGELOG entries on this branch are still to be rewritten by Stu before merge.

AI Usage

Please disclose whether you've used AI anywhere in this PR (it's cool, we just want to know!):

• I have used Claude Code
• I have used another model
• I have not used AI

You can read more details in our Responsible AI Policy

Pre-submission checklist

• I have performed an AI review of my code (we recommend using /review with Claude Code)
• I have implemented and tested all related authorization policies. (e.g., :owner, :admin, :editor, :viewer)
• I have updated the changelog. The entries are still to be rewritten by Stu.
• I have ticked a box in "AI usage" in this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.95336% with 59 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.8%. Comparing base (b034e02) to head (9b6e852).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/lightning_web/api/errors.ex	89.2%	10 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning/auth_providers/auth_config_form.ex	33.3%	4 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning/workflows/graph_rules.ex	94.4%	4 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning_web/api/filters.ex	84.0%	4 Missing ⚠️
...tning_web/controllers/api/credential_controller.ex	97.8%	3 Missing ⚠️
...b/lightning_web/controllers/webhooks_controller.ex	85.0%	3 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning/collections.ex	97.4%	2 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning/credentials.ex	97.8%	2 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning/credentials/oauth_validation.ex	93.9%	2 Missing ⚠️
lib/lightning/invocation/query.ex	92.9%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 20 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #5239     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   91.5%   91.8%   +0.3%     
=======================================
  Files        466     479     +13     
  Lines      23841   24250    +409     
=======================================
+ Hits       21813   22252    +439     
+ Misses      2028    1998     -30     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.